A $10 hair cut
Why go for haircuts when you're going to leave everything in place and still look just as ugly?
It's a bloody waste of money. The money could've been used to feed me instead, but no, you just have to waste 10bucks cutting NOTHING.
I was at Okinawa or something just now, queuing up for a haircut.
Then there's this Montford turd-face waiting also. He was earlier than me, and watching him tell the cutter what to do was one big mistake.
He wanted to keep this, keep that, cut a bit here and there, blah blah.
What does he want?? Is he trying to waste his $10 just to spite the aunty: 'Hey, I'm spending money to cut nothing, haha.'
You know what? Big deal. Take your money and shove it.
There used to be a joke that females take a much longer time asking the hairstylist, or cutter, what to do with their useless deadweight called, hair.
'Haircut?'
'Uh, I want this, that, blah blah'
'...ok'
Juxtaposed with a guy's answer, which would be monosyllabic 'Yea.'
What's the world coming to? Guys don't need ugly hair covering their faces.
'Oh! Look at me! I got hair covering my face! I AM SO HANDSOME! I am so handsome that I need hair to cover my face!'
Eat your own bullshit, you piece of crap.
If you are really that handsome, you won't need stupid things like 'hair' covering your face.
If you need them to look good, you most probably do the 'I'm covering my face because I look best unseen' kind of thing.
You know what was the worst thing? When that Montford guy stood up, he turned around, looked at me, and gave a rather condescending smile.
What, I lost to you in terms of ugliness? Great job, I wasn't even trying.
Throw away your hair, and grow some brains instead of hair.
It'd be better if he looks good with long hair. At least I won't be blogging about him.
BUT NO!
He looks like some faggot with that hairstyle. His face was brown, spectacles black, hair's black.
What's there to look at? His skin? His non-prominent facial features?
Yea I guess that made him handsome.
Some people look good with long hair, that I agree. But this guy should give up on that iFea.
Why? He won't look good in anything, and so he can start saving money by getting a shorter haircut. At least it'd be value for money.
As for me, the cutter exclaimed her shock at how long it has been since I cut. Which was definitely at least 3months.
Save money.
Now my head's lighter.
I know I'm not handsome. I won't try to be. Instead, I'd show off to the whole world that this walking disaster, is still walking.
So what if I'm not handsome? At least my friends won't walk out of me if I somehow get disfigured, as there was never much of a shape to begin with.
Here's an iFea, take your looks and shove it.
At least I know where I'm walking to. I won't end up banging some poles or signboards due to visual-obstruction.
Oh, I know what to be next time. I can become a hairstylist. A professional one at that. And I don't have to be professional at all.
It's a simple job, really.
Just fake to the boys that keeping the hair would be best for them. Then cut a wee bit here and there, and call it a day.
It'd be wise to charge them $100 each time they come. No, I don't mean ejaculate, though they might, in their excitement of the thoughts that they'd get laid that night, not knowing that they'd soon become walking Sadakos. I guess the cat shouldn't be too happy, now that there are so many of it around.
Man, I'm a genius. I can seriously earn big bucks this way.
Face it--hairstylists are just slackers who cut a bit here, perm/gel, call it a day, and eat huge amounts of money.
Cutters are just people who...shave the heads of people.
That Montford guy won't be reading this, because he most probably can't. Why?
He's a Sadako, and won't be able to read. Hair covering his eyes, not bothering to cut...I guess even the most retarded of all would be able to cross the 2 iFeas together and get what I'm trying to say.
Grow up.
-- 12/19/2007 01:25:00 AM