审美观
This may seem a bit late, but make no mistakes--it is late.
April fools:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/04/01/april.fools.pranks/index.html
It is the only day in which you can crap about stuff and get away with it. You can even proclaim your love for someone on April Fool's and laugh it off as a joke if it phailed.
Lies hide within the truth, and the truth hides within lies. That is mist. Or something along those lines, I can't be bothered rewatching an entire episode just to get that part(which might be loosely translated).
I remember getting one of those messages and it shocked me quite a bit. =.=
April fool's is just another day at AJ. Dang boring as usual. Oh well. Some things can't be helped. Heard about crazy stuff other JCs did, but I'm glad I didn't get scammed too much.
Something random:
'Lecture' is an euphemism for 'lullaby'.
Let's talk about 审美观.
In the past, women found hairy men attractive. Now, they don't. That's because they redefined 'beauty'. I still don't understand why are females disgusted by leg hair and stuff though. It's normal for guys to dislike other testosterone-filled guys, but it's not normal for females to do that.
Which is why men these days are becoming sissies, all to fit the woman's taste. This is because the vision of beauty has changed.
Women these days are more 'empowered' in a way. It's like they are seen to be capable of climbing up the corporate ladder(which is possible), and there are the 'career women', and the like. So they are supposedly 'stronger', which is simply a repeat of what I've already said.
So now they have the ability to make demands, one of which is that their male partners must be cleanly shaved. I don't know why are they so against hair and testosterone. After all, testosterone makes males men, and hair all over the place is a mark of high testosterone level. Not that people without hair all over their body is of lower testosterone level, but that it's not obvious that they have a high level of that hormone.
Since men are seen to be more manly with hair, why do women cringe and scream stuff like 'ZOMG SO DISGUSTING!!!111!!!' when they see hair?
I don't understand what my protein did to repulse girls, and I'd really prefer wearing my Cat High pants just to strut my stuff.
I think that the concept of 'beauty' is really warped.
The same goes for females. In the Tang dynasty, fat women are beautiful in the eyes of the Tang males. Now, skinny is sexy. I don't feel the need to love lipids(or lack of).
Perhaps the day would come when 'ugly' of now becomes 'beautiful' of later, because the concept of beauty is subjective and more or less evolves.
Moral of the story? I love my leg hair and am proud of my high level of testosterone(which sexplains my almost-perpetual boners), and saying that my leg hair is disgusting makes won't cause me to shave, because I don't care enough to shave.
I'd just be a bit disappointed, because of the aggressor's lack of ability to appreciate the wonder of leg hair and testosterone.
And they say it with such self-righteousness, too: 'Eeeyer it's so disgusting!'
They say it almost as if I should epilate because of their unimportant comments.
Here's how I see it: Don't look, or just get used to it. I'm not redesigning my leg for anyone. At least not yet =\
So take that and shove it. I like my testosterone and leg hair as they are.
The world gets more warped with each passing day. Definitions have all changed, and people acting as if their definitions are correct. Of course, there is no correct definition of beauty except mine, and I say that my leg hair looks good.
OK I sorta lost my point.
As many of you probably already know, the winner of this year's CSS was a small little boy. I can't help but wonder: how long more can he carry on singing before his voice breaks? After his voice breaks, can he still sing as well?
More importantly, can he even sing in the first place? I've never watched this year's CSS. Come to think of it, the only CSS year I watched was its first one. Then it all got boring. It's the same shit and stuff. Kids singing, and kids who can't sing singing, well yeah you pretty much got the point.
I think this year's worse though. Why do they cry on every installment? Is there really a need to cry? What are they trying to prove by crying--that they 'feel', or that they are hypocritical pieces of human flesh?
Audience: OHHH SHIT SHE'S CRYING ZOMG WE MUST CHEER HER UP AND THE ONLY WAY TO DO THAT IS TO VOTE HER IN!!!!111!!!
Or: Oh she's crying because of blah blah blah, this means that she 'feels', and therefore we must vote her in because she's human.
What the fuck is this?
Or the 'Oh shit now I'm one of the only 2 left, so it's either me or him/her. Now's the time to act sporting and start crying and prepping for what to say when I get in because of my apparent larger family support and start acting like a hypocrite and cry for the other person who didn't get in.'
This is just wrong. Kids these days are getting more and more scheming and learning the ways of the world. Not healthy.
Another thing about CSS is how it hypes up the schools the contestants are in. Like the small little boy and how his school is 'proud of him'.
OK he can sing, or he got voted that he's able to sing, BIG DEAL. It sounds like the sort of thing one would say in an argument he/she is losing: Oh we lost here and there and here and there and almost everywhere, but never mind. It is OK for me to be less intelligent and less successful in life, BECAUSE I HAVE A BIGGER CHEST/PENIS AND THAT'S ALL THAT MATTERS.'
Screw off.
-- 4/12/2009 12:57:00 AM
