You just self-owned.
There are some people who think that they own it all because they are able to point out something rather retarded. I randomly add guys at times, and sometimes I get bullshit-people like the below:
Jay Yeo:
in the information age, there are simply too many channels available for people to stalk. outrightly adding people to stalk is plain stupid, you could have added a personal message of "for pet society/castle age/mafia wars/cafe world" for added believability. anyway it's an interesting social experiment of over 1k people, could make for a good campaign evaluation. good day.
about an hour ago · Comment · Like · See Wall-to-Wall
Obviously he's pissed about something. Commenting on someone's social experiment and dubbing it as 'plain stupid' isn't something very wise to do, especially if you don't know that person at all. I mean, you don't know a person, you don't know exactly what his motives are, and you say he's 'plain stupid' just by an action alone.
He's retarded. He even contradicted himself, because he claims(knows) that it's a social experiment. In an experiment, there are variables that could be changed or kept constant. And if I really did put in that personal message I would've defeated the purpose of the account in the first place, which is that the RECIPIENT of the friend request DOES NOT KNOW the SENDER(me) at all, and the purpose of my adding the RECIPIENT is completely unknown to the RECIPIENT. Saying that I'm adding only for Mafia wars would dilute this sense of bewilderment at some random guy adding you. Not to mention if the person's Facebook username is really weird, and spells the person's weird tendencies to the max.
So I fired back.
Me:
responding to the add request positively isn't the most intelligent thing to do either. the aim of this account is to gauge just how unguarded people of this information age are. so...yeah.
also, there's no need to add those personal messages because it's supposed to be a social experiment as you rightly pointed out. putting in those personal messages would defeat the purpose.
2 seconds ago · Delete
I hope he gets the point and that this wouldn't escalate into a flame war, because he has already pissed me off.
And like I said, I seem to have pissed him off by gracing him with my friend request, so I shall piss him off some more by adding his girlfriend.
I'm not sure whether she's going to accept the friend request or not, but I know I won't be missing her too much. She's ugly. Like him. As in seriously.
I am OK with ugly people, although I am a very dashing young man. What I'm not OK with is ugly guys camwhoring. It won't be as bad if you've got good complexion and look delectable(even for a guy, that's if a guy can look delectable in my eyes, and that rarely happens), but if you don't have it, please kindly shut the fuck up and don't camwhore TYVM.
I feel like posting his picture for comic relief, but on second thoughts, naw. I won't be that evil. I might infringe some laws too. Not healthy.
I commend him for his balls though. To be able to simply talk to a random guy whom he doesn't know, that takes courage. In a way or two. I mean, it's tiring to type. It's even more tiring for ME to type because he's a retard and I had to find a way to reply him in the most civil manner. I wanted to add in a few fiery words, like saying that his comment is totally unnecessary and that he jut self-owned, but I didn't because I'm a civilized man.
But what the hell man. This kind of person also can get girlfriend. I lost in life.
And on a completely random note, here's a bit more info about him which might give us a better insight to his weird actions, aka self-own:
High School:
St Joseph's Institution '07
-- 12/17/2009 04:14:00 AM
